Efficacy of different surgical treatments for management of anal fistula: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Currently, the anal fistula treatment which optimises healing and preserves bowel continence remains unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the relative efficacy of different surgical treatments for AF through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases up to October 2022 identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical treatments for anal fistulae. Fistulae were classified as simple (inter-sphincteric or low trans-sphincteric fistulae crossing less than 30% of the external anal sphincter (EAS)) and complex (high trans-sphincteric fistulae involving more than 30% of the EAS). Treatments evaluated in only one trial were excluded from the primary analyses to minimise bias. The primary outcomes were rates of success in achieving AF healing and bowel incontinence. RESULTS: Fifty-two RCTs were included. Of the 14 treatments considered, there were no significant differences regarding short-term (6 months or less postoperatively) and long-term (more than 6 months postoperatively) success rates between any of the treatments in patients with both simple and complex anal fistula. Ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) ranked best for minimising bowel incontinence in simple (99.1% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 70 patients) and complex anal fistula (86.2% of comparisons; 3 trials, n = 102 patients). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence in existing RCTs to recommend one treatment over another regarding their short and long-term efficacy in successfully facilitating healing of both simple and complex anal fistulae. However, LIFT appears to be associated with the least impairment of bowel continence, irrespective of AF classification.

Novel chyme reinfusion device for gastrointestinal fistulas and stomas: feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: High-output enterostomies and enteroatmospheric fistulas are common causes of intestinal failure, and may necessitate parenteral nutrition and prolonged hospital stay. Reinfusing lost chyme into the distal gut is known to be beneficial, but implementation has been limited because manual reinfusion is unpleasant and labour-intensive, and no devices are available. A new device is presented for reinfusing chyme easily and efficiently, with first-in-human data. METHODS: The device comprises a compact centrifugal pump that fits inside a standard stoma appliance. The pump is connected to an intestinal feeding tube inserted into the distal intestinal limb. The pump is activated across the appliance by magnetic coupling to a hand-held driver unit, effecting intermittent bolus reinfusion while avoiding effluent contact. Safety, technical and clinical factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Following microbiological safety testing, the device was evaluated in ten patients (median duration of installation 39·5 days; total 740 days). Indications included remediation of high-output losses (8 patients), dependency on parenteral nutrition (5), and gut rehabilitation before surgery (10). Reinfusion was well tolerated with use of regular boluses of approximately 200 ml, and no device-related serious adverse events occurred. Clinical benefits included resumption of oral diet, cessation of parenteral nutrition (4 of 5 patients), correction of electrolytes and liver enzymes, and hospital discharge (6 of 10). Of seven patients with intestinal continuity restored, one experienced postoperative ileus. CONCLUSION: A novel chyme reinfusion device was developed and found to be safe, demonstrating potential benefits in remediating high-output losses, improving fluid and electrolyte balance, weaning off parenteral nutrition and improving surgical recovery. Pivotal trials and regulatory approvals are now in process.

ANTECEDENTES: Las ostomías y las fístulas entero-atmosféricas de alto débito son causas frecuentes de insuficiencia intestinal y pueden precisar nutrición parenteral (NP) y una hospitalización prolongada. Se sabe que la reinfusión del quimo perdido en el intestino distal es beneficiosa, pero su práctica se ha visto limitada porque la reinfusión manual es desagradable, laboriosa y no hay dispositivos disponibles. Se presenta un nuevo dispositivo para reinfundir el quimo de forma fácil y eficiente, junto con los primeros datos en humanos. MÉTODOS: El dispositivo constaba de una bomba centrífuga compacta que cabe dentro de una bolsa de ostomía estándar. Esta bomba iba conectada a una sonda intestinal colocada en el intestino distal. La bomba se activa manualmente mediante el acoplamiento magnético de una manivela, que evita el contacto con el efluente y permite efectuar la reinfusión de bolos discontinuos. Se evaluaron factores de seguridad, técnicos y clínicos. RESULTADOS: Después de las pruebas de seguridad microbiológica, se evaluó el dispositivo en 10 pacientes (mediana de tiempo de funcionamiento 39,5 días; total 740 días). Las indicaciones abarcaron la paliación de pérdidas cuantiosas (n = 8), la dependencia de NP (n = 5) y la rehabilitación intestinal antes de la cirugía (n = 10). La reinfusión se toleró bien utilizando bolos repetidos de ~200 ml, y no hubo efectos adversos graves relacionados con el dispositivo. Los beneficios clínicos incluyeron la reanudación de la dieta oral, el cese de la NP (4/5 pacientes), la corrección de trastornos electrolitos y de las enzimas hepáticas y el alta hospitalaria (6/10). De los 7 pacientes en los que se reconstruyó el tránsito digestivo, uno experimentó un íleo postoperatorio. CONCLUSIÓN: Se ha desarrollado un nuevo dispositivo de reinfusión de quimo que ha demostrado su seguridad y beneficios potenciales para paliar pérdidas cuantiosas, restaurar el equilibrio hidroelectrolítico, retirar la NP y mejorar la recuperación quirúrgica. Están en marcha los ensayos clínicos pivotales y el proceso para obtener los permisos reglamentarios.

Network meta-analysis of local and regional analgesia following colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management after colorectal surgery remains challenging. Systemic opiates delivered on demand or via a patient-controlled pump have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment. Opiate analgesia is associated with slower gastrointestinal recovery and unpleasant side-effects; many regional and local analgesic techniques have been developed as alternatives. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched systematically for RCTs comparing analgesic techniques after major colorectal resection. A network meta-analysis was performed using a Bayesian random-effects framework with a non-informative prior. Primary outcomes included pain at rest and cumulative opiate consumption 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain at rest and cumulative opiate consumption at 48 h, pain on movement and cough at 24 and 48 h, time to first stool, time to tolerance of oral diet, duration of hospital stay, nausea and vomiting, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Seventy-four RCTs, including 5101 patients and 11 different techniques, were included. Some inconsistency and heterogeneity was found. SUCRA scores showed that spinal analgesia was the best intervention for postoperative pain and opiate reduction at 24 h. Transversus abdominus plane blocks were effective in reducing pain and opiate consumption 24 h after surgery. Subgroup analysis showed similar results for open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches, and enhanced recovery after surgery programmes. CONCLUSION: Spinal analgesia and transversus abdominus plane blocks best balanced pain control and opiate minimization in the immediate postoperative phase following colorectal resection. Multimodal analgesia reduces pain, minimizes systemic opiate use and optimizes postoperative recovery.

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento del dolor postoperatorio después de cirugía colorrectal sigue siendo difícil. Los opiáceos sistémicos administrados a demanda o mediante una bomba controlada por el paciente ha sido tradicionalmente el principal tratamiento. Sin embargo, la analgesia con opiáceos se asocia con una recuperación gastrointestinal más lenta y con efectos secundarios desagradables, lo que dado lugar al desarrollo de numerosas técnicas analgésicas regionales y locales como modalidades alternativas. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas en las bases de datos Medline, Embase y CENTRAL para identificar ensayos controlados aleatorizados (randomized controlled trials, RCTs) que compararan técnicas analgésicas después de una resección colorrectal mayor. Se realizó un metaanálisis en red utilizando un marco bayesiano de efectos aleatorios con una distribución a priori no informativa. Los criterios de valoración primarios incluyeron dolor en reposo y el consumo de opiáceos a las 24 horas después de la operación. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron dolor en reposo y el consumo de opiáceos a las 48 horas, dolor con el movimiento y al toser (a las 24 y 48 horas), tiempo hasta la primera deposición, tiempo hasta tolerar la dieta oral, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, náuseas y vómitos, y complicaciones postoperatorias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 74 RCTs, con un total de 5.101 pacientes y 11 técnicas diferentes. Se encontró cierta inconsistencia y heterogeneidad. Las puntuaciones de dolor en reposo más bajas y la menor ingesta de opiáceos postoperatorios a las 24 horas correspondieron a la analgesia espinal. Los bloqueos del plano transverso del abdomen fueron efectivos para reducir el dolor y el consumo de opiáceos a las 24 horas después de la cirugía. El análisis de subgrupos mostró resultados similares para los abordajes quirúrgicos abiertos versus mínimamente invasivos y para los programas de recuperación intensificada después de la cirugía (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ERAS). CONCLUSIÓN: La analgesia espinal y el bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen consiguieron un mejor control del dolor y una disminución de los opiáceos en el postoperatorio inmediato tras la cirugía colorrectal. La analgesia multimodal reduce el dolor, minimiza el uso de opiáceos sistémicos y optimiza la recuperación postoperatoria.

Diverticular disease epidemiology: acute hospitalisations are growing fastest in young men.

BACKGROUND: Older age has long been linked to risk of diverticulitis, but the epidemiology is seldom described for a national population. The aim of this study was to investigate age- and gender differences in incidence, temporal trends, lifetime risk and prevalence related to acute diverticulitis hospitalisations in New Zealand. METHODS: Records of all hospitalisations with diverticulitis the primary diagnosis were obtained from the Ministry of Health for the period 2000-2015. The first acute diverticulitis admission recorded for an individual was taken as an incident event; all others were classified as recurrent. Trends in age- and sex-specific and age-standardised incidence rates are described, and lifetime risk and prevalence estimated. RESULTS: Over the 16 years from 2000 to 2015, 37,234 acute hospitalisations for diverticulitis were recorded in 28,329 people aged 30 + years (median = 66 years). Rates of incident hospitalisations rose with age, from 5/10,000 person-years at age 50-54 years to 19/10,000py by age 80-84 years. Rates for women were lower than men before age 55 years, but higher thereafter. Age-standardised rates rose 0.2/10,000py annually, but approximately doubled among men aged < 50 years. Lifetime risk was estimated at over 5%, with the prevalence pool rising to over 1.5% of the population aged 30+ in 2030. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid increases in diverticulitis admissions among young men since 2000 correspond with increases reported elsewhere but remain unexplained; notably young women follow similar trends 5-10 years later. Increasing incidence, combined with population ageing, adds urgency to explain diverticular formation, to understand factors that trigger or provoke their inflammation/infection, and to clarify treatment and (self-)management pathways.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the time to recovery of gut function after elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Postoperative ileus causes significant patient morbidity after abdominal surgery. Some evidence suggests nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce time to gut recovery, but there has not been a meta-analysis to assess their efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the benefit of NSAIDs for recovery of postoperative gut function in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. METHOD: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and reference lists were searched with no date or language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of NSAIDs with placebo in the perioperative or postoperative period were identified. Included studies reported outcomes relevant to gut function: time to pass flatus or stool and time to tolerate an oral diet. The mean difference in time from surgery until passage of flatus, stool and tolerance of diet were meta-analysed using a random-effects model in RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: This study identified 992 relevant articles. Five randomized controlled trials on patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery met our inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. Compared with placebo, NSAIDs significantly improved the time to pass flatus (mean difference -9.44 h, 95% CI: -17.22, -1.65, I2 = 70%, P = 0.02), time to pass stool (mean difference -12.09 h, 95% CI: -17.16, -7.02, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001) and time to tolerate a diet (mean difference -11.95 h, 95% CI: -18.66, -5.24, I2 = 0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: NSAIDs significantly improve time to gut recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Current evidence is not adequate to identify whether selective or nonselective drugs should be recommended. Further high-power studies using selective drugs are required.

Hyperactive cyclic motor activity in the distal colon after colonic surgery as defined by high-resolution colonic manometry.

BACKGROUND: Recovery after colonic surgery is invariably delayed by disturbed gut motility. It is commonly assumed that colonic motility becomes quiescent after surgery, but this hypothesis has not been evaluated rigorously. This study quantified colonic motility through the early postoperative period using high-resolution colonic manometry. METHODS: Fibre-optic colonic manometry was performed continuously before, during and after surgery in the left colon and rectum of patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, and in healthy controls. Motor events were characterized by pattern, frequency, direction, velocity, amplitude and distance propagated. RESULTS: Eight patients undergoing hemicolectomy and nine healthy controls were included in the study. Colonic motility became markedly hyperactive in all operated patients, consistently dominated by cyclic motor patterns. Onset of cyclic motor patterns began to a minor extent before operation, occurring with increasing intensity nearer the time of surgery; the mean(s.d.) active duration was 12(7) per cent over 3 h before operation and 43(17) per cent within 1 h before surgery (P = 0.024); in fasted controls it was 2(4) per cent (P < 0·001). After surgery, cyclic motor patterns increased markedly in extent and intensity, becoming nearly continuous (active duration 94(13) per cent; P < 0·001), with peak frequency 2-4 cycles per min in the sigmoid colon. This postoperative cyclic pattern was substantially more prominent than in non-operative controls, including in the fed state (active duration 27(20) per cent; P < 0·001), and also showed higher antegrade velocity (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Distal gut motility becomes markedly hyperactive with colonic surgery, dominated by cyclic motor patterns. This hyperactivity likely represents a novel pathophysiological aspect of the surgical stress response. Hyperactive motility may contribute to gut dysfunction after surgery, potentially offering a new therapeutic target to enhance recovery.

Association Between Circular Stapler Diameter and Stricture Rates Following Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stricture is a common complication of gastrointestinal (GI) anastomoses, associated with impaired quality of life, risk of malnutrition, and further interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the association between circular stapler diameter and anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract. METHODS: A systematic literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was performed. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically or endoscopically confirmed anastomotic stricture. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random-effects models to determine the effect of circular stapler diameter on stricture rates in different regions of the GI tract. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were identified: seven oesophageal, twelve gastric, and three lower GI. Smaller stapler sizes were strongly associated with higher anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract. The oesophageal anastomosis studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 4.39 ([95% CI 2.12, 9.07]; P < 0.0001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 1.71 ([95% CI 1.15, 2.53]; P < 0.008). Gastric studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 3.12 ([95% CI 2.23, 4.36]; P < 0.00001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 7.67 ([95% CI 1.86, 31.57]; P < 0.005). Few lower GI studies were identified, though a similar trend was found: 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: pooled OR 2.61 ([95% CI 0.82, 8.29]; P = 0.100). CONCLUSIONS: The use of larger circular stapler sizes is strongly associated with reduced risk of anastomotic stricture in the upper GI tract, though data from lower GI joins are limited.

Intra-operative high-resolution mapping of slow wave propagation in the human jejunum: Feasibility and initial results.

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical slow waves are a coordinating mechanism of small intestine motility, but extracellular human studies have been restricted to a limited number of sparse electrode recordings. High-resolution (HR) mapping has offered substantial insights into spatiotemporal intestinal slow wave dynamics, but has been limited to animal studies to date. This study aimed to translate intra-operative HR mapping to define pacemaking and conduction profiles in the human small intestine. METHODS: Immediately following laparotomy, flexible-printed-circuit arrays were applied around the serosa of the proximal jejunum (128-256 electrodes; 4-5.2 mm spacing; 28-59 cm2 ). Slow wave propagation patterns were mapped, and frequencies, amplitudes, downstroke widths, and velocities were calculated. Pacemaking and propagation patterns were defined. KEY RESULTS: Analysis comprised nine patients with mean recording duration of 7.6 ± 2.8 minutes. Slow waves occurred at a frequency of 9.8 ± 0.4 cpm, amplitude 0.3 ± 0.04 mV, downstroke width 0.5 ± 0.1 seconds, and with faster circumferential velocity than longitudinal (10.1 ± 0.8 vs 9.0 ± 0.7 mm/s; P = .001). Focal pacemakers were identified and mapped (n = 4; mean frequency 9.9 ± 0.2 cpm). Disordered slow wave propagation was observed, including wavefront collisions, conduction blocks, and breakout and entrainment of pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study introduces HR mapping of human intestinal slow waves, and provides first descriptions of intestinal pacemaker sites and velocity anisotropy. Future translation to other intestinal regions, disease states, and postsurgical dysmotility holds potential for improving the basic and clinical understanding of small intestine pathophysiology.

Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.

AIM: There is increasing awareness of the poor functional outcome suffered by many patients after sphincter-preserving rectal resection, termed 'low anterior resection syndrome' (LARS). There is no consensus definition of LARS and varying instruments have been employed to measure functional outcome, complicating research into prevalence, contributing factors and potential therapies. We therefore aimed to describe the instruments and outcome measures used in studies of bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection and identify major themes used in the assessment of LARS. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies published between 1986 and 2016. The instruments and outcome measures used to report bowel function after low anterior resection were extracted and their frequency of use calculated. RESULTS: The search revealed 128 eligible studies. These employed 18 instruments, over 30 symptoms, and follow-up time periods from 4 weeks to 14.6 years. The most frequent follow-up period was 12 months (48%). The most frequently reported outcomes were incontinence (97%), stool frequency (80%), urgency (67%), evacuatory dysfunction (47%), gas-stool discrimination (34%) and a measure of quality of life (80%). Faecal incontinence scoring systems were used frequently. The LARS score and the Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) were used in only nine studies. CONCLUSION: LARS is common, but there is substantial variation in the reporting of functional outcomes after low anterior resection. Most studies have focused on incontinence, omitting other symptoms that correlate with patients' quality of life. To improve and standardize research into LARS, a consensus definition should be developed, and these findings should inform this goal.

Limited evidence of abnormal intra-colonic pressure profiles in diverticular disease - a systematic review.

AIM: Abnormal colonic pressure profiles and high intraluminal pressures are postulated to contribute to the formation of sigmoid colon diverticulosis and the pathophysiology of diverticular disease. This study aimed to review evidence for abnormal colonic pressure profiles in diverticulosis. METHOD: All published studies investigating colonic pressure in patients with diverticulosis were searched in three databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus). No language restrictions were applied. Any manometry studies in which patients with diverticulosis were compared with controls were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) for case-control studies was used as a measure of risk of bias. A cut-off of five or more points on the NOS (fair quality in terms of risk of bias) was chosen for inclusion in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies (published 1962-2005) met the inclusion criteria. The studies followed a wide variety of protocols and all used low-resolution manometry (sensor spacing range 7.5-15 cm). Six studies compared intra-sigmoid pressure, with five of six showing higher pressure in diverticulosis vs controls, but only two reached statistical significance. A meta-analysis was not performed as only two studies were above the cut-off and these did not have comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of manometry data shows that evidence for abnormal pressure in the sigmoid colon in patients with diverticulosis is weak. Existing studies utilized inconsistent methodology, showed heterogeneous results and are of limited quality. Higher quality studies using modern manometric techniques and standardized reporting methods are needed to clarify the role of colonic pressure in diverticulosis.

Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is widely recognized as a significant problem in the community. Conjecture exists around the proportion of the population affected. This systematic review evaluated studies reporting the community prevalence of FI in terms of methodology, design and definitions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Collaboration and National Guideline databases were searched for studies investigating the prevalence of FI in community-based adults published from January 1966 to February 2015. Study data, including methodology, sample size, response rate, definition of FI and prevalence rates, were extracted on to a pro forma and appraised critically. Where possible, FI prevalence estimates were pooled. RESULTS: Thirty studies were analysed from 4840 screened articles. FI prevalence estimates varied from 1·4 to 19·5 per cent. This variation was explained by differences in data collection method and two factors within definitions of FI: type of stool and frequency of FI episodes. When these factors were accounted for, the FI prevalence at a threshold of at least once per month for liquid or solid stool was 8·3-8·4 per cent for face-to-face or telephone interviews, and 11·2-12·4 per cent for postal surveys. The pooled prevalence rate from studies for functional FI (defined by ROME II criteria) was 5·9 (95 per cent c.i. 5·6 to 6·3) per cent. CONCLUSION: When comparable methodologies and definitions are used, studies produce remarkably similar prevalence rates in different community populations. FI remains an unspoken symptom, with lower rates reported in personal interviews compared with anonymous postal questionnaires.

Restoration of normal colonic motor patterns and meal responses after distal colorectal resection.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal resections alter colonic motility, including disruption of control by neural or bioelectrical cell networks. The long-term impact of surgical resections and anastomoses on colonic motor patterns has, however, never been assessed accurately. Fibreoptic high-resolution colonic manometry was employed to define motility in patients who had undergone distal colorectal resection. METHODS: Recruited patients had undergone distal colorectal resections more than 12 months previously, and had normal bowel function. Manometry was performed in the distal colon (36 sensors; 1-cm intervals), with 2-h recordings taken before and after a meal, with comparison to controls. Analysis quantified all propagating events and frequencies (cyclical, short single, and long single motor patterns), including across anastomoses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients and 12 controls were recruited into the study. Coordinated propagating events directly traversed the healed anastomoses in nine of 12 patients with available data, including antegrade and retrograde cyclical, short single and long single patterns. Dominant frequencies in the distal colon were similar in patients and controls (2-3 cycles/min) (antegrade P = 0·482; retrograde P = 0·178). Compared with values before the meal, the mean(s.d.) number of dominant cyclical retrograde motor patterns increased in patients after the meal (2·1(2·7) versus 32·6(31·8) in 2 h respectively; P < 0·001), similar to controls (P = 0·178), although the extent of propagation was 41 per cent shorter in patients, by a mean of 3·4 cm (P = 0·003). Short and long single propagating motor patterns were comparable between groups in terms of frequency, velocity, extent and amplitude. CONCLUSION: Motility patterns and meal responses are restored after distal colorectal resection in patients with normal bowel function. Coordinated propagation across healed anastomoses may indicate regeneration of underlying cellular networks.

Predicting the patients who will struggle with anal incontinence: sensitivity to disgust matters.

AIM: Quality of life varies in patients with anal incontinence. The severity of symptoms is a surprisingly modest predictor, but they reliably elicit disgust. The current work assessed prospectively whether dispositional sensitivity to disgust predicted the quality of life in patients with anal incontinence. METHOD: Seventy-five patients with anal incontinence identified from the waiting list for the pelvic floor clinic at the Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand, completed questionnaires assessing symptom severity (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) and disgust sensitivity (Disgust Sensitivity-Revised scale) prior to a first appointment. Three months later incontinence-specific (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, FI QLS) and general quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, WHOQOL-BREF) were assessed. RESULTS: Greater severity of symptoms prospectively predicted lower incontinence-specific quality of life (FI QLS lifestyle domain) and lower general quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF environmental domain). Greater disgust sensitivity predicted poorer psychological and environmental well-being, and moderated the link between symptom severity and outcome. Persons low in disgust sensitivity reported a higher quality of life when symptom severity was low, but those with a high disgust sensitivity had a low quality of life regardless of symptom severity. CONCLUSION: The functional status of patients with anal incontinence explains some but not all of the variation in quality of life. Emotional factors such as disgust appear to have a role. Disgust sensitivity warrants further attention.

Circumferential and functional re-entry of in vivo slow-wave activity in the porcine small intestine.

BACKGROUND: Slow-waves modulate the pattern of small intestine contractions. However, the large-scale spatial organization of intestinal slow-wave pacesetting remains uncertain because most previous studies have had limited resolution. This study applied high-resolution (HR) mapping to evaluate intestinal pacesetting mechanisms and propagation patterns in vivo. METHODS: HR serosal mapping was performed in anesthetized pigs using flexible arrays (256 electrodes; 32 × 8; 4 mm spacing), applied along the jejunum. Slow-wave propagation patterns, frequencies, and velocities were calculated. Slow-wave initiation sources were identified and analyzed by animation and isochronal activation mapping. KEY RESULTS: Analysis comprised 32 recordings from nine pigs (mean duration 5.1 ± 3.9 min). Slow-wave propagation was analyzed, and a total of 26 sources of slow-wave initiation were observed and classified as focal pacemakers (31%), sites of functional re-entry (23%) and circumferential re-entry (35%), or indeterminate sources (11%). The mean frequencies of circumferential and functional re-entry were similar (17.0 ± 0.3 vs 17.2 ± 0.4 cycle min(-1) ; P = 0.5), and greater than that of focal pacemakers (12.7 ± 0.8 cycle min(-1) ; P < 0.001). Velocity was anisotropic (12.9 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) circumferential vs 9.0 ± 0.7 mm s(-1) longitudinal; P < 0.05), contributing to the onset and maintenance of re-entry. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study has shown multiple patterns of slow-wave initiation in the jejunum of anesthetized pigs. These results constitute the first description and analysis of circumferential re-entry in the gastrointestinal tract and functional re-entry in the in vivo small intestine. Re-entry can control the direction, pattern, and frequency of slow-wave propagation, and its occurrence and functional significance merit further investigation.

The use of local anaesthesia in haemorrhoidal banding: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Rubber band ligation is a common office procedure for the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids. It can be associated with pain and vasovagal symptoms. The effect of local anaesthetic use during banding was studied. METHOD: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out in the colorectal outpatient clinic. Patients presenting with symptomatic haemorrhoids suitable for banding were prospectively recruited and randomized to undergo the procedure with local anaesthetic or without (control). Submucosal bupivacaine was injected immediately after banding just proximal to the site. Vasovagal symptoms were assessed at the time of banding and pain scores (visual analogue scale) were recorded at the conclusion of the procedure, after 15 min, and on leaving the clinic. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (40 local anaesthetic injection, group 1; 32 no injection, group 2) were recruited. The mean ages were 50 and 54 years respectively, the median duration of symptoms was 12 months in each group and the median number of haemorrhoids banded was three in each group. The mean pain score on leaving the clinic was 2.6 (95% CI 2.1, 3.1) in group 1 and 4.1 (95% CI 3.3, 5.0) (P = 0.04) in group 2. There were no complications related to local anaesthetic use. No significant difference in vasovagal symptoms was found (P = 0.832). CONCLUSION: Local anaesthetic injection at the time of banding is simple and safe. It may reduce patient discomfort following banding of haemorrhoids.

Determining levels of fecal incontinence in the community: a New Zealand cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a socially stigmatized condition, and its prevalence in the community has been problematic to quantify because of difficulty with its definition. OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the community prevalence of fecal incontinence in New Zealand by 3 scales of measurement: patient perceptions of a "problem with bowel control," their symptoms, and their quality of life. DESIGN/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A postal survey of 2000 people, aged >18, randomly selected from the national electoral roll, was performed. This used a validated, reliability-tested, anonymous questionnaire, the Comprehensive Fecal Incontinence Questionnaire, incorporating the identification of a "problem with bowel control," the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: The response rate was 68.7%. A total of 14.7% (95% CI: 12.6-16.7) of participants "felt they had a problem with bowel control" and 12.4% (95% CI: 10.5-14.5) had fecal incontinence when defined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index table as "leakage of liquid or solid stool ≥ 1/month." In terms of quality of life, 26.8% of the population (95% CI: 24.2-29.4) noted some impairment on the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. In total, 155 (13.2%) participants reported at least 2 of the 3 possible diagnostic measures, and this may provide a way to incorporate the 3 measures into a new definition of fecal incontinence. LIMITATIONS: This study incorporated a new "generic" question enquiring about an individual's perception of a bowel control problem and also introduced a "cutoff" value for Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale to attempt to identify those with any impairment "due to accidental bowel leakage." CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to highlight some of the challenges involved with suitably identifying those who have fecal incontinence within the community. The prevalence rate of 13.2% represents a realistic measure of the burden of fecal incontinence in the general population, and further research in this area is recommended.

Randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major surgery is associated with postoperative insulin resistance which is attenuated by preoperative carbohydrate (CHO) treatment. The effect of this treatment on clinical outcome after major abdominal surgery has not been assessed in a double-blind randomized trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery or liver resection were randomized to oral CHO or placebo drinks to be taken on the evening before surgery and 2 h before induction of anaesthesia. Primary outcomes were postoperative length of hospital stay and fatigue measured by visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Sixty-nine and 73 patients were evaluated in the CHO and placebo groups respectively. The groups were well matched with respect to surgical procedure, epidural analgesia, laparoscopic procedures, fasting period before induction and duration of surgery. Postoperative changes in fatigue score from baseline did not differ between the groups. Median (range) hospital stay was 7 (2-35) days in the CHO group and 8 (2-92) days in the placebo group (P = 0.344). For patients not receiving epidural blockade or laparoscopic surgery (20 CHO, 19 placebo), values were 7 (3-11) and 9 (2-48) days respectively (P = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CHO treatment did not improve postoperative fatigue or length of hospital stay after major abdominal surgery. A benefit is not ruled out when epidural blockade or laparoscopic procedures are not used. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN012605000456651 (http://www.anzctr.org.au).

Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of ventral rectopexy (VR) surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse (RP) and rectal intussusception (RI) in adults. Method MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and other relevant databases were searched to identify studies. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies with more than 10 patients receiving ventral mesh rectopexy surgery were considered for the review. RESULTS: Twelve nonrandomized case series studies with 728 patients in total are included in the review. Seven studies used the Orr-Loygue procedure (VR with posterior rectal mobilization to the pelvic floor) and five studies used VR without posterior rectal mobilization. Overall weighted mean percentage decrease in faecal incontinence (FI) rate was 45%. The weighted mean percentage decrease in constipation rate was 24%. Weighted mean recurrence rate was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: There are limitations in published literature on VR. The available data indicate that VR has low recurrence and improves FI in patients suffering from these conditions. There is a greater reduction in postoperative constipation if VR is used without posterior rectal mobilization.

Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review all published evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence (FI) in adults. METHOD: Electronic searches were performed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge and other relevant databases. Hand searching of relevant conference proceedings was undertaken. Studies were considered if they met the predefined inclusion criteria of more than ten adult patients and receiving an injectable bulking agent for passive FI with a validated means of assessing preoperative and postoperative incontinence. RESULTS: Thirteen case series studies and one randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) were included with a total of 420 patients. Two completed RCTs with placebo control were identified but results were unobtainable. Coaptite, Contigen, Durasphere, EVOH and PTQ injections were assessed with 24, 73, 83, 21 and 208 patients respectively. Most studies reported a statistically significant improvement in incontinence scores and quality of life. No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment and placebo arms in the RCT. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Currently there is little evidence for the effectiveness of injectable bulking agents in managing passive FI. The inability to obtain results from two further RCTs concerned the reviewers and hindered their ability to make strong recommendations. The identified injectable bulking agents appear to be safe with only minor complications reported.